EPA

Senator Rand Paul Steps Up to Protect Property Owners from Outlaw Federal Agencies

U.S. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) has just introduced legislation designed to reign in out-of- control federal agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers. The bill, if enacted, will be a vital blow to the enforcement of radical environmental/Agenda 21- inspired regulations. The bill is called the Defense of Environment and Property Act of 2012 (S.2122).

A little history: in 1972, as the environmental movement was getting its start through popular efforts to stop pollution in our rivers and air, Congress passed the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (later called the Clean Water Act).The law prohibited the discharge of pollutants into “navigable waters” without a federal permit. The problems began when the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers made a power grab by enforcing the act over ponds, occasional mud puddles, and even dry lands by labeling them as wet lands.

The result has been disastrous to property owners and businesses, sometimes even leading to jail sentences to “violators.”

The result of such outrageous interpretations of the Clean Water Act has led Senator Paul to introduce his bill to do the following:

Senator Rand Paul Steps Up to Protect Property Owners from Outlaw Federal Agencies [continued]

 

Sen. Rand Paul on Why He’s Single-Handedly Blocking Pipeline Safety Legislation

Avowed libertarian Rand Paul of Kentucky is single-handedly blocking legislation in the Senate meant to address some of the deficiencies in pipeline regulation that contributed to the San Bruno disaster last year. The bill, called the Pipeline Transportation Safety Improvement Act of 2011, has nearly unanimous support in the Senate, plus the backing of industry.

You can read the full text of the bill (pdf), or a summary of the mandates it would impose, including the installation of “shut-off valves in new or entirely replaced transmission pipelines,” but not on existing pipelines like the one that exploded in San Bruno.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, the net cost of the legislation to the federal government is $46 million over the 2012-2016 period. Or barely a rounding error in the context of the overall budget. You can read the estimate here.

Paul is blocking the bill by refusing to agree to a commonly used method to pass legislation in the Senate. From AP:

[The bill] was approved without opposition by the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee in May. Paul is the only senator opposing an effort by the bill’s Democratic sponsors to pass it swiftly using “unanimous consent” procedures that eliminate the need for a time-consuming debate.

So what does Paul have to say about his blocking action? His office issued a statement this morning:

Sen. Rand Paul on Why He’s Single-Handedly Blocking Pipeline Safety Legislation [continued]

Candidate 7-8